Matter and motion, the pinnacle of energy and force is described in so many ways The idealist calls it Good vs Evil, The metaphysical thinker see it in a form of absolute, the dialectical materialist sees this as the process that defines every movement from Chemistry to History. This battle of opposites is a fluid phenomena of history on every level.  and this brought me to my Dialectic Equations. 

Dialectic Equations. 

What do these mean? Why do these exist? More importantly, why should any marxist be invested in these?

As a Marxist, This mode of thinking goes hand in hand with Dialectical materialism. Now, I believe that every event in history is strung together in a spiral like motion and affected by such by the reactions of Attraction and Repulsion. Now that this is established,  this goes hand in hand with my Dialectic Equations,  why you ask? well, my equations are a formula to model how the movement of motion (as relative to the base) shapes the matter (the super structure) and with that said,  I accompany all 3 Dialectic laws in this and give the variables a material structure. the goal is to formulate from Capitalism to prove that communism is the answer. I call it Materialist Formula.

 

What do I mean?  

Well, I call it Materialist Formula for the reason that the whole entirety of human events act in a spiral of change. We are a Dialectic process of human evolution and act in the battle of Attraction and repulsion now, you can make the the objective decision in calling it an equation that doesn't stop and changes as new variables are added, negated or changed through energy. There is no absolute end to this formula but there is only simplifications and better ways of understanding. Dialectic Equations are attempting just that, the goal is to offer the equations as an answer to each progression of the spiral like change in human evolution following the laws of Structural determinism but variants can be added or negated and will still come out to the same basic conclusion. For instance,  I use Capitalism as a base, now, I offered a formula to explain that base and give the variables of the super structure to reflect that base. As I add or negate certain variants, it evolves in a spiral like pattern (which I gained fascism). Now, the examples I gave for it were the basis of Laissez-faire to Keynesianism and then to imperialism.  You could do the same with Hayek, Freidman, or any capitalist school and still reflect the base of economic movement and evolution, same with socialism.

 

Why should you be interested in these?  

Since they are a new concept to the thinking of Marxism, And we have established explanations of all the economic bases and can use the super structures to reflect change, why would you need the formulas? Simple, you don't. You don't need to be able to formulate what has already happened, but these are a useful tool for new marxists or those who lack the complex thinking of Marxism and want a simpler guide to understand and interact with gaining this knowledge. It will provide the 3 Dialectic laws,  help you understand how they are used and give you a hands on experience with these laws So you can better understand. 

To understand the variables, I have broken them down (at least for capitalism and socialism) in previous essays on Dialectic Equations and will provide a variable guide In the near future. Whether you find these to be elementary or unnecessary means you either fully understand Marxist philosophy or simply don't want to put the time in.  For those who do want to use these,  and I hope you do,  you will have an interactive tool to be able to apply Dialectical materialism,  Structural determinism and do so effectively. 

I hope this helps.  

Comrade Staricka